Talk about the limitations of the narrative of "Why China", the concept of China should not be replaced by the Central Plains

2024-02-21 23:37:53 Express information

The first issue of "Why China" has been launched on the major genuine video platforms.I also made some opinions on its first issue of "Qin Han".In my personal opinion, I propose a concept of "Great China". Of course, this concept is not a novel content. The academic community has reached a consensus.I saw the message area of the article, and some readers did not agree, or basically did not know the concept of "Great China".So, I want to talk about this today.

我在对《何以中国的》分析文章当中认为,这部纪录片从考古的热门话题角度讲“何以中国”,Cheap Reps虽然是热门话题小道,但也有一定量的LJR Jordan价值,但这部纪录片在叙事角度上,存在疏漏,Best Shoe Rep或者In questionable places- "Why China" is still from the traditional Central Plains perspective to talk about Chinese history, which is separated from each other with the concept of the great history of China.

What is the perspective of Great China?My opinion is that at least in the field of area, it is necessary to be based on the current 9.6 million square kilometers, or even a wider sea area.To put it simply, China should be divided into four major sections, the Central Plains, the Western Regions, the Grassland Plate and the Plateau plate.These four sectors together constitute the regional territory of Chinese history, and interact, and eventually achieved "why is China."

I criticize the narrative perspective of "Why China" is too small, which is based on this.In the first phase of "Qin and Han", when the battle between the Qin Dynasty, the Han Dynasty and the Huns was described, these wars were still regarded as a war against foreign aggression.Even our princess went to the Western Regions and relatives, and changed three consecutive husbands. The purpose was to combine the Western Regions and resist foreign aggression together.This narrative lacks the global perspective of "the Great History of China".

In ancient Chinese civilization, it was always a long -lasting role between the nomadic civilization and the farming civilization.If we check some information, we will find that during the three emperors and five emperors, many of our ancestors lived a nomadic life.Many wars that occurred in the three emperors and five emperors were also war between nomadic tribes and farming tribes.The migration of the Huangdi tribe all the way has actually had the transformation of nomadic to farming.

Starting from the historical records of the three emperors and five emperors, the nomadic civilization of the grassland is not a civilization outside the Chinese civilization, not a foreign nation.Therefore, even in the Qin and Han dynasties, the story of the Huns' story should be based on the perspective of conflict and integration between the nation, and it cannot be regarded as a matter of resisting foreign aggression.

In our ancient history, the blending between the Central Plains civilization and the grassland civilization is the most, and it always disappears.The ancients said this, standing on the standpoint of the Central Plains dynasty, there was no problem.But we are not very suitable now.This is like this. During the Warring States Period, Handan people must stand on the standpoint of Zhao Guo to talk about the conflict of Qin Zhao. Can we still use this position now?Of course not.

The four sections of the Central Plains, Grassland, Western Regions, and Plateau work together.The contents of the fusion of these four sectors are actually more worthy of explanation.For example, in "Why China", the first issue of "Qin and Han", instead of waste a lot of space in the Han Dynasty how to unite the Western Regions, how to get married with three men, it is better to talk about it.Is there any interoperability between?

Why is the Western Regions and the Central Plains one in the end?It is because there are interoperability between these two sectors, and the integrity of Chinese civilization is finally constructed.This is what you have me, you have you, and in the end you and me are united.The same thing actually happened between the Central Plains and Grassland, between the Central Plains and the Plateau.Nomadic civilization and farming civilization have always been interactive on ancient China.This is visible to the naked eye.There is also a large fusion between the Central Plains and the Plateau. Of course, ordinary people have too little information about information in this area and require some professional science popularization content.

Our very old way of speaking in history is that the Central Plains dynasty was finally strong, united, and ran away who around and who around him.This backward way to talk about history is to talk about China.For example, it is also said that the chapter of "Qin Han" talks about the relationship between the Central Plains and the grassland, and just tells that the Han dynasty ran away the Xiongnu, it didn't mean much.what's next?What about the communication and communication between the Central Plains and the grassland?The highlight is behind.Not to mention the documentary, ordinary audiences may really do not know.