On January 4th,热门事件 Jindi Tai (SZ300225, the stock price was 9.97 yuan, and the market value of 4.7 billion yuan) announced that he received the "Administrative Penalty Decision" from the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau.
"Daily Economic News" reporter noticed that in February last year, Jin Litai announced that it was shared by the China Securities Regulatory Commission.In December last year, Jin Litai received the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau's "Administrative Penalty Promise".Subsequently, Jin Litai and related personnel gave statements and defense opinions at the hearing.
Jin Litai said: "Jin Litai has no malicious fraud, and does not know that there is a circular trade."
Regarding the relevant defense opinions of Jin Litai, the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau believes that multiple facts comprehensively determine that Jin Litai knows that the actual situation of the gold trade business is not wrong.
Fiction of about 1.5 billion yuan "Gold Trade Business"
According to supervision, in May 2020, Jin Litai established Shanghai Jinsai Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jinlitai Industrial), a wholly -owned subsidiary, and it was participated in Zhejiang Yunfa Culture Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Zhejiang Yunfa).Gold Trade Business ".
From May 2020 to July 2021, Jin Litai Industrial and downstream customers set up a total of 41 gold sales contracts, with a contract amount of 1.509 billion yuan; correspondingly, Jinlitai Industrial and Zhejiang Yunfa and other upstream suppliers set up 41 gold procurement contracts.The contract amount totaled 1.485 billion yuan.The trade target is 1kg/piece AU9999 custom gold bar.
According to the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau, the above business is named in the name of trade and is essentially funding and financial business. Jinlitai Industry signed a purchase and sales contract with upstream suppliers and downstream customers.In fact, only the obligations of the cashier are performed and the use of funds can be earned.
According to the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau, Jin Litai did not disclose the real situation of participating in the "gold trade business" and included the relevant gold products involved in the above "gold trade business" into inventory.28.32%of the company's shareholders' net assets led to false records of the annual report of 2021; Jinlitai included the purchase and sales difference formed by the above business into revenue.The 6.11%caused false records in the first quarter of 2022.
The Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau believes that Jin Litai was then Yuan Xiang, the then chairman and general manager, Yan Jiahua, then deputy general manager, and then the director of the board of directors.Information disclosure directly responsible for illegal supervisors.
Jin Litai argued that he didn't know
Jin Litai and his agents put forward four defense opinions in the statement of defense materials and hearing.
Jin Litai said that first, the gold trade business is not a fictional trade, and related logistics funds have not formed a closed loop.Second, the opinions of the audit institutions were repeatedly selected, and the financial measurement method was chosen cautiously.Jin Litai Industry and Zhejiang Yunfa signed the "Entrusted Storage Agreement" to meet the conditions for confirmation of inventory confirmation.Based on the characteristics of golden precious metals, there is no abnormality in related purchase and selling contracts, which meets the conditions of accounting standards for income confirmation.Third, there are no subjective faults. The accounting error caused by accounting does not affect key financial data such as net assets and net profit. It will not cause significant adverse effects on the market and investors.Administrative penalties should be given.Fourth, Jin Litai did not have malicious fraud, and did not know that there was a circular trade.
At the same time, all the competent persons involved in Yuan Xiang and others mentioned the saying that "the circular trade situation behind the gold trade business is unknown".
Regarding the above -mentioned "unknown" statement, the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau said that evidence of the case proves that Jinlitai Industrial and upstream signed the purchase and sales contract at the same time without bear the risk of inventory;Yu Jin Litai, the inlet and exit of funds formed a corresponding relationship, and used it for the payment on the same day after the bridge. At the same time, during the delivery process of 777 custom -made gold bars, the designated consignees designated by the downstream customers were the facts of the staff of Zhejiang transportation.It can be comprehensively determined that Jinlitai knows that the actual situation of the gold trade business is not wrong.
In response to the opinions of Yuan Xiang, Jingjing Law, Tang Yang, and Sui Jingyuan, the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau believes that the parties should know that the gold trade business should be a funding and financial business through consulting the purchase and sales contract, and shall bear the corresponding responsibilities of the illegal acts involved in the case.
In response to the opinions of Yan Jiahua's statement, the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Bureau believes that Yan Jiahua's planning company participated in the "gold trade business", inspected, reviewed the purchase and sales contract, reviewed related business documents, etc., and learned that the gold trade business was pragmatic as a financial and financial business.Yan Jiahua has a great role in income and inventory confirmation.